• Welcome to Кардшаринг НТВ+ на cardsharing .cc - самый надёжный и стабильный шаринг!.
CLICK HERE TO ENTER BILLING / ВОЙТИ В БИЛЛИНГ

Mgcamd priority.list for NC+ and Cyfrowy Polsat

Started by Tunia2, 29 April 2017, 19:22:07

Previous topic - Next topic

Tunia2

Could anyone help me with creating a priority.list just for NC+ and Cyfrowy Polsat?

Would this be correct?

X: { 01 00 }
X: { 0B 01 }
X: { 18 03 }
X: { 18 61 }

Or should I use the 'universal' one that's available here:

V: { 04 06 20 }
V: { 06 0C 00 }
V: { 06 0A 00 }
V: { 04 06 00 }
V: { 04 28 00 }
X: { 06 02 }
X: { 06 52 }
X: { 09 63 }
X: { 4A E1 }
X: { 0D 96 }
X: { 18 33 }

Thanks
VU+ Solo 4K, VIP Poland, VTi Image, Ccam 2.3.9

suma

Typically, ignore and priority lists created for Dreamboxes and VU+ are empty. You may delete it at all and try again.
VU+Zero. 13E, 82.5E, 56E, Vip All, OpenPLI 6.0 image, OSCam: 1.20-unstable_svn. ALL POSTS WITHOUT SIGNATURE AND LOG-FILE will be ignored and deleted!1.mg_cfg here [url="http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic=23717.msg58140#msg58140"]http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic=23717.msg58140#msg58140[/url]
2. ignore-priority.lists here [url="http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic"]http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic[/url]

Tunia2

Quote from: suma on 30 April 2017, 07:52:42
Typically, ignore and priority lists created for Dreamboxes and VU+ are empty. You may delete it at all and try again.

Thanks for your advise. I tried deleting them, but it seems that the channel zapping takes even longer then - is there anything else I can do to speed it up?

Everything was fine until last week, when there were those issues with NC+ / Polsat.

Would it make any difference if I use Cccam (via Mgcamd) instead of Newcamd?

Thanks
VU+ Solo 4K, VIP Poland, VTi Image, Ccam 2.3.9

suma

1. Use our default settings for Mgcamd emulator https://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic=28088.0
2. Cccam (via Mgcamd) instead of Newcamd? MgCamd is emulator used with Newcamd protocol. If you initially use MgCamd emulator, it is running with Newcamd protocol (the same). Try Cccam via MgCamd and see the result.
VU+Zero. 13E, 82.5E, 56E, Vip All, OpenPLI 6.0 image, OSCam: 1.20-unstable_svn. ALL POSTS WITHOUT SIGNATURE AND LOG-FILE will be ignored and deleted!1.mg_cfg here [url="http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic=23717.msg58140#msg58140"]http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic=23717.msg58140#msg58140[/url]
2. ignore-priority.lists here [url="http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic"]http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic[/url]

Tunia2

Thanks again for your help.

I'm already using your settings for Mgcamd emu.

Yes, that's what I meant - Mgcamd emu with Newcamd protocol is what I'm using normally, but I will see if changing the protocol to Cccam will improve channel zapping (I also tried using Oscam emu but wasn't happy with its performance).

In general it's not that slow (although it's slower than it was a week ago) but there are certain channels (i.e. Eurosport 1 & 2 HD PL) that take 5-6 sec to start.
VU+ Solo 4K, VIP Poland, VTi Image, Ccam 2.3.9

suma

The main thing here is that you have no rules violation. I think, a couple of channels with slower zapping is not a problem.
VU+Zero. 13E, 82.5E, 56E, Vip All, OpenPLI 6.0 image, OSCam: 1.20-unstable_svn. ALL POSTS WITHOUT SIGNATURE AND LOG-FILE will be ignored and deleted!1.mg_cfg here [url="http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic=23717.msg58140#msg58140"]http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic=23717.msg58140#msg58140[/url]
2. ignore-priority.lists here [url="http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic"]http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic[/url]