Вход в биллинг - Billing entrance - www.CardsharingServer.com

English forum section

Автор Тема: CCCamd not recommended or prohibited ?  (Прочитано 4895 раз)

misenko

  • Новичок
  • *
  • Сообщений: 4
CCCamd not recommended or prohibited ?
« : 25 Сентября 2012, 22:31:24 »
Hi guys, I'm new here and I have a question concerning this emu. If a buy a subscription there is a statement that ccamd is not recommended to use with your server but on the other side there are lot of post saying that it is forbidden and one risk the ban using this emu. My question is why do you provide N codes for ccamd if a user get ban for it ? It is not valid for all CCCamd modules and versions so they can work with you server or why? I have no problem to use MgCamd 1.35 but for me it would be better to use ccamd 2.3 because my Irdeto ICE works only with this emu and in case of internet connection loss I don't need to switch softcam :) It's just more convenient.

Thx for explanation!
Vu+ Uno, OpenPLI, 23.5 Skylink

suma

  • Модератор
  • Ветеран
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 10091
  • Keep trying!
Re: CCCamd not recommended or prohibited ?
« Ответ #1 : 26 Сентября 2012, 05:31:25 »
Hi,
You may consider NOT RECOMMENDED equal to PROHIBITED. It does not matter... If you use this EMU, you are using it at your own risk. EMU was tested and is not recommended (=prohibited). At the first moment, it seems working OK. But after some time, it becomes glitching with all consequences arized from its work. As a result- you will have ban.
So, I think, the question about not recommended or prohibited is not reasonable.
VU+Zero. 13E, 82.5E, 56E, Vip All, OpenPLI 6.0 image, OSCam: 1.20-unstable_svn. ALL POSTS WITHOUT SIGNATURE AND LOG-FILE will be ignored and deleted!1.mg_cfg here http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic=23717.msg58140#msg58140
2. ignore-priority.lists here http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic

suma

  • Модератор
  • Ветеран
  • *****
  • Сообщений: 10091
  • Keep trying!
Re: CCCamd not recommended or prohibited ?
« Ответ #2 : 26 Сентября 2012, 05:36:08 »
in case of internet connection loss I don't need to switch softcam

We do not recommend using softcam as well. We insist to delete it at all as it prevents sharing. Otherwise, why then to use sharing at all?
VU+Zero. 13E, 82.5E, 56E, Vip All, OpenPLI 6.0 image, OSCam: 1.20-unstable_svn. ALL POSTS WITHOUT SIGNATURE AND LOG-FILE will be ignored and deleted!1.mg_cfg here http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic=23717.msg58140#msg58140
2. ignore-priority.lists here http://www.cardsharing.cc/index.php?topic

misenko

  • Новичок
  • *
  • Сообщений: 4
Re: CCCamd not recommended or prohibited ?
« Ответ #3 : 26 Сентября 2012, 06:03:11 »
Thx for reply, I have Iredto ICE and there are many programs in basic package for free and I use them often. So the advantage of simulatenous usage of a card and cs server is that it reduces server load because these programs can be decoded by a card and on the other hand it can be usefull when connection is lost because the card will take over :-) But it's just detail. Of course I don't need a card since servers works correctly...
Vu+ Uno, OpenPLI, 23.5 Skylink

gobb

  • Пользователь
  • **
  • Сообщений: 14
Re: CCCamd not recommended or prohibited ?
« Ответ #4 : 11 Марта 2013, 02:05:36 »
Thx for reply, I have Iredto ICE and there are many programs in basic package for free and I use them often. So the advantage of simulatenous usage of a card and cs server is that it reduces server load because these programs can be decoded by a card and on the other hand it can be usefull when connection is lost because the card will take over :-) But it's just detail. Of course I don't need a card since servers works correctly...
Cau, to ma zaujima. Vyriesil si to nejak? Teda paralelne digital balik z karty a obcas cs..